Ok...here it goes...For what I saw, which wasn't much, regarding Trump's speech, in fact, this was the first time I've seen the guy act like a normal human being, but there was some likes and dislikes I had about his speech. Let's start with his fight on immigration reform-He wants to enhance the border patrol's capabilities on the powers of arrest and prioritize border prosecutions, which I'm guessing that if a illegal immigrant commits a felonious act of crime, he or she will be prosecuted here in the states instead of just being deported back to their country of origin. And this brings up another controversial subject he had talked about, which was the idea of enforcing sanctuary cities to follow federal law or stand the chance of having their federal funding cut-off, which could possibly cost them hundreds of millions of dollars...actually about 2.7 billion dollars the last time I heard.
I've had several people ask me what was the meaning behind a sanctuary city, which are all over this country including San Francisco and Los Angeles. One definition describes a sanctuary city as a broad term applied to a jurisdiction( in this case a city) that either have policies or practices that are designed to limit any cooperation with the federal immigration department with the action, for ex. an arrest of a illegal alien that needs to be notified or addressed to the federal immigration department, but are not. Another example would be like the Los Angeles Police Department indicating last year that they will not allow their patrol officers to stop people solely to establish their immigration status, which is a requirement demanded from the federal government. Now I would like to make one suggestion, where if a illegal immigrant from any foreign country is arrested for committing any acts of violence, sexual assault or drug offense should serve a lengthy prison term in the U.S to its full capacity, in better words, none of this short-time crap, and then be deported to their country without any chance of obtaining there citizenship in the United States and if they are caught in our country again then increase their incarceration substantially similar to the 3-strikes you're out law. I disagree with enforcing some of the federal immigration ordinances or policies where a police officer should stop a person just to check their immigration status because there are lot of good hard working illegal immigrants that obey our laws and promote this nation's economy, we just need to convince them to obtain their citizenship and join in on paying our taxes maybe perhaps by initiating special incentives, for instance, a large reduction in the citizenship process or teach them the benefits of becoming a U.S citizen like voting rights and employment with the federal government.
Trump declared in a GOP Republic meeting that he has the full support of the Republican party to built a wall at the borderline between the U.S and Mexico...hmm..funny they don't mention Canada where wanted felons love to cross and drugs are brought in along with the Cuban cigars during the embargo. Well..this project is going to cost anywhere from 15 to 40 billion dollars to build and who do you think is going to fit the bill?...Mexico? Uuh...that's hard to imagine especially after the Mexican president has just canceled his meeting with Trump for next week regarding it's construction! So how is Donald going to have Mexico pay for this? Stop foreign aid or place tariffs on their trade...careful Mr. Trump...for a sword sometimes is double-sided! Shouldn't we use the 15 billion dollars to enhance our border patrol instead because wall or not it will not stop these drug cartels from importing that's for sure.
Now I did like the way Donald handled the 35% business tax initiated on any U.S business that want to transfer their company out of the U.S to another foreign country, which is approx. $35,000 out of a $100,000, so I give you a couple of points there Mr. President, but if you plan to commit to cutbacks of federal funding and grants administered by federal agencies to enforce the sanctuary cites regarding following immigration law, let me remind you...that the courts have a rule that any federal funding decisions may not be used to "coerce" any state for not participating on any particular action, but who knows...after all, we live in a society where the buck is above the law! And please don't waste any time and money ( may it be out of your wallet or ours) to conduct your own investigation regarding the presidential voting scandal because I'm sure it will be covered up if the investigation reveals anything of a disadvantage toward you and what good well come out of it? Let's make sure it doesn't happen again and move on!
No comments:
Post a Comment